Breast lift

A breast lift removes excess skin from a drooping breast, moves the breast tissue upwards and reshapes it. In medical terms the operation is called mastopexy. This article covers what the operation involves, who it suits, what scar is left on the skin, whether it can be combined with augmentation, what the evidence says about non-surgical methods, which risks are involved, whether drooping returns and what is known about breastfeeding.

What is a breast lift?

Drooping of the breast is the downward movement of breast tissue and skin under gravity, pregnancy, breastfeeding, weight change and ageing.

Drooping does not take one form. In true ptosis the nipple and areola have moved downwards. In pseudoptosis and glandular ptosis the nipple may remain above the fold beneath the breast while the tissue gathers in the lower pole. The distinction matters for planning; the position of the nipple alone does not determine the operation.

A lift is not simply removing skin. During surgery the breast tissue can be redistributed, folded, moved upwards and shaped to create projection from the person's own tissue; where needed, a limited amount can be removed. The breast then sits higher and more gathered.

What the operation is not matters as well. A lift is not a volume-adding operation. Where volume is also wanted, it is planned together with breast augmentation; in marked drooping an implant alone does not reliably raise the breast, and an implant heavier than the tissue can carry may increase drooping and tissue tension.

The line between a lift and a breast reduction does not rest on whether tissue is removed. What decides it is the main aim of the operation, the volume removed, and whether the size of the breast is causing physical complaints. In a large breast that causes no symptoms, a lift can be done with the volume preserved or with limited reduction; where the size causes complaints and a meaningful reduction in volume is the aim, breast reduction comes to the fore.

Who does it suit?

The most common reasons for seeking a breast lift are drooping after pregnancy and breastfeeding, excess skin after marked weight loss, a difference in height between the two sides, and a nipple that points downwards and outwards.

In some situations the operation may be delayed, or the underlying problem should be treated first:

• Pregnancy and breastfeeding. Breast volume and skin are unstable during this period
• Weight loss still in progress. Reaching the target weight is expected first
• An active infection anywhere in the body
• A finding in the breast tissue that has not been assessed or fully treated
• Smoking. The interval needed for stopping is set out below

After marked weight loss the breast shows not only drooping but loss of volume as well. In a review of 12 studies covering 79 patients, almost all patients in this group were reported to have some degree of drooping together with a volume deficit, and a lift was often planned alongside a volume-adding procedure.¹ That observation belongs to patients who have had massive weight loss and cannot be generalised to everyone considering a lift. Where there is excess skin in more than one area, the order and timing are the subject of a plan for body contouring after weight loss.

Where pregnancy is planned in the near future, delaying the operation is sensible. Pregnancy and breastfeeding can alter the shape achieved.

What does the examination look at?

The consultation starts by assessing expectations. What the person wants, how long they have wanted it, and what has already been considered are all asked about.

Measurements follow. The following are assessed together:

• The position of the nipple and areola and the distance it will be moved
• Excess skin in the vertical and horizontal directions
• Breast volume and base width
• How the breast tissue is distributed and the length of the lower pole
• The quality of the skin and the breast tissue
• Emptiness in the upper pole
• The difference between the two sides
• Previous operations and scars
• Whether volume needs to be added or reduced
• Plans for pregnancy and breastfeeding

The operation is planned by weighing all of these together; it is not settled by a single measurement.

Whether breast volume is sufficient is assessed separately. Where volume has been lost as well as skin becoming loose, a lift alone raises the breast but may not provide the desired fullness in the upper pole.

Smoking, diabetes, blood pressure, current medication and previous operations are part of this conversation. Depending on your age and history, breast imaging may be requested. If pregnancy or breastfeeding is planned, that should be raised.

How is the operation planned?

Three separate decisions are made in planning. What scar will be left on the skin, which tissue the nipple will keep its blood supply through, and whether volume will be added.

What scar is left on the skin?

The scar left on the skin is largely the same as in breast reduction. Three common approaches exist. The scar can stay around the areola alone, a vertical scar running down from the areola can be added, or a further horizontal scar in the fold beneath the breast can be added below the vertical one; the last of these is called the inverted-T, also known as the anchor-shaped scar.

A scar around the areola alone may be considered where there is limited excess skin and limited lifting to do. Its capacity to lift and reshape is limited and it may not suit advanced drooping. With this approach the scar encircles the areola. In the review of lift procedures, scar problems and problems involving the nipple and areola were the two most frequently reported headings.²

The vertical scar gives more control over skin in both the vertical and horizontal directions and allows the breast tissue to be reshaped into a cone. Against that, in advanced drooping or where tissue quality is poor it may not always avoid a horizontal scar.

The inverted-T (anchor) scar may be needed where there is marked excess skin in both directions, in advanced drooping, in a large or heavy breast, and where skin and tissue quality are poor.

The choice is not made on "which scar is shorter" alone. The amount and direction of excess skin, the distance the nipple will travel, the volume and the quality of the tissue are weighed together.

Which tissue does the nipple keep its blood supply through?

The nipple is usually carried on a stalk of tissue that supplies it, without being completely detached. That stalk is called a pedicle.

Where the pedicle is raised from relates to preserving the blood supply of the nipple and areola, preserving the nerves that carry sensation, the possibility of breastfeeding, the distance the nipple will travel, breast volume and tissue distribution, and scars from previous operations.

There is no single pedicle that is superior for every patient. The choice follows the anatomy and the surgical plan.

How is the breast tissue shaped?

Tightening the skin alone is often not enough. The breast tissue is rearranged to form the cone of the breast; where needed, limited projection can be created in the upper pole or centrally from the person's own tissue.

This is not the equivalent of the volume an implant provides, nor of long-term upper pole fullness.

Will volume be added?

The decision follows the volume already present:

• Where volume is sufficient, a lift without an implant can be done
• Where volume is excessive, a lift with limited reduction or a breast reduction comes into question
• Where volume is insufficient, an implant, fat transfer or, in suitable patients, shaping with the person's own tissue may be considered
• In marked drooping an implant alone may not be enough

Fat transfer does not provide unlimited or certain volume; how much of the transferred fat remains varies from person to person. The detail is in the breast augmentation article.

Can a lift and an augmentation be done in the same operation?

They can, although the two work against each other. A lift tightens the skin envelope while an implant expands it. An operation combining them therefore calls for more careful planning than a lift alone.

In a systematic review pooling 4,856 operations from 23 studies, the total complication rate where a lift and an augmentation were done in one session was 13.1 per cent. The most frequently reported problem was recurrent drooping (5.2 per cent), followed by scar problems (3.7 per cent), capsular contracture (3.0 per cent) and tissue-related asymmetry (2.9 per cent). The reoperation rate was 10.7 per cent.³

Three limits should be kept in mind when reading these figures. The studies included differ markedly in technique, in how outcomes were defined and in length of follow-up. Mean follow-up ranged from 16 to 173 weeks, with most studies reporting under 1 year. These rates are therefore not one person's result, nor a settled figure for today's techniques.

In a recent single-centre observational study following 289 operations for a median of 46 months, implant-related complications occurred in 6.6 per cent, tissue-related complications in 26.0 per cent and reoperation in 19.4 per cent. In the same study, previous augmentation or mastopexy, high-projection implants and smoking were associated with complications or reoperation.⁴ That is the result of one centre, not a meta-analysis.

Where an implant is used, the operation also carries implant-specific headings: capsular contracture, rupture, displacement, becoming visible or palpable, imaging follow-up of the implant, later implant-related surgery, and the rare conditions associated with implants. The detail is in the breast augmentation article.

A difference in satisfaction is also reported. In a retrospective survey completed by 1,022 women from 19 countries, satisfaction with the breasts was lower among patients who had a lift combined with an augmentation than among those who had an augmentation alone. In that group, longer time since surgery and a higher body mass index were associated with lower satisfaction. Implant plane, shape and size were not associated with satisfaction.⁵ The survey alone does not establish change within the same individuals over time, or a causal effect of these factors.

Doing it in one session has the advantage of one anaesthetic, one operation and one recovery. Against that, the implant widening the skin envelope and the lift narrowing it have to be balanced within the same operation; implant volume, the skin to be removed, tissue shaping and the safety of the blood supply are all planned at once. Implant-related and tissue-related reasons for further surgery can both be present.

In the staged approach the tissue and shape can be seen after the first operation, and the implant or correction at the second stage can be planned with more control. In return it means 2 operations, 2 anaesthetics, 2 recovery periods and a longer overall process.

Where the skin is weak, the drooping advanced, a marked increase in volume is wanted, there is marked asymmetry, an operation has been done before, there are old scars around the areola or there is concern about the blood supply, the staged option is discussed more. Neither can be said to be superior for every patient.

Is a non-surgical lift possible?

Radiofrequency and similar energy-based devices are marketed as a "non-surgical breast lift". The evidence behind that claim has been examined.

A systematic review of studies using these devices found only 3 publications. All three showed high patient satisfaction, and no complications were reported. However, once the photographs were corrected for differences in magnification and tilt and then measured, the distance from the sternal notch to the nipple was shorter by a mean of 2 millimetres on each side, with no meaningful change in the lower border of the breast. None of these differences were statistically significant. The review notes that all three studies were affected by commercial bias, and concludes that energy-based methods are not a substitute for a lift.⁶

The practical consequence is this. The low-quality studies available do not show that energy-based methods provide a lift equivalent to surgery, or one that is clinically meaningful. They should not be presented as a proven alternative to a lift in marked drooping.

How do you prepare for surgery?

Smoking and nicotine: Smoking is a risk factor for wound healing problems after surgery. Direct surgical data on nicotine products other than cigarettes are scarcer. The practice reference of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons notes a lack of clinical data on e-cigarette use and surgical risk, but states that because nicotine is known to reduce blood flow, e-cigarettes and other nicotine products are regarded as a potential risk factor.⁷ Stopping smoking, vaping and other nicotine-containing products at least 1 month before the operation, and not using them after surgery until healing is complete, is therefore advised. The studies below concern smoking cessation; their results do not establish the same reduction in risk for every nicotine product. A review pooling 6 randomised and 15 observational studies showed that every week of abstinence added benefit, and that studies with at least 4 weeks of abstinence produced markedly better results than shorter ones.⁸ A study appraising systematic reviews together reported that cessation interventions beginning at least 4 weeks before surgery and combining multiple behavioural support sessions with pharmacotherapy reduced complications. The same study notes that interventions with only one component, even when started more than 4 weeks before surgery, raise quit rates without reducing complications.⁹ Shorter intervals are not useless either: in a meta-analysis of 55 studies covering adults undergoing a range of operations, the risk of pulmonary complications was 27 per cent lower in relative terms among those who stopped at least 2 weeks before surgery, and 29 per cent lower among those who stopped at least 4 weeks before, compared with those who continued smoking.¹⁰ The benefit therefore grows as the interval lengthens; being late does not make stopping pointless. The interval applied and the nicotine policy can vary from surgeon to surgeon.

Weight: Weight is expected to be stable before surgery. Marked changes afterwards can alter the shape of the breast and the result achieved.

Coexisting illness: Diabetes and blood pressure are expected to be under control before surgery. Where there is an active infection in the body, surgery is postponed.

Medication: Blood thinners and some herbal products can increase bleeding. Every medicine and supplement you take needs to be declared. Prescribed medication should not be stopped on your own decision.

Imaging: Depending on your age and history, breast imaging may be requested beforehand.

What is recovery like?

The intervals below are a general framework. They can vary with the extent of the operation, the person's work, how quickly they heal and the surgeon's practice.

• The operation is done under general anaesthetic and usually takes 2 to 3 hours
• The hospital stay is most often 1 night
• If a drain is used it is usually removed in the first few days; when it comes out depends on how much fluid is draining and on the surgeon's assessment
• Stitches that need removing are taken out within 2 weeks; dissolving stitches do not need removing
• Returning to work takes 1 to 2 weeks for most people
• Driving waits at least 2 weeks
• Heavy physical work and sport are postponed for about 6 weeks
• Most of the swelling settles in the first months; the tissues softening and the final shape emerging can take 3 to 6 months

Immediately after surgery the breasts can look higher, tighter or unfamiliar. As the swelling settles and the tissues relax, the breast moves out of this appearance and settles onto the fold beneath it. Settling into shape in this way can take 3 to 6 months.

Whether a drain is used can vary with the technique and the assessment made during surgery. Where one is used, when it comes out depends on the amount of fluid and on clinical assessment.

What to watch for after surgery

The following is a general framework. Where the instructions you were given differ, your surgeon's instructions apply.

Bra: A supportive bra or an elastic bandage is used after surgery to reduce swelling and support the breasts.¹¹ Your surgeon decides how it is worn and for how long. Because swelling can change breast size over the first months, it is worth waiting for the shape to settle before buying a bra in a permanent size.

Sleeping: Lying on the back, or with the upper body slightly raised, is more comfortable for most people in the first weeks. When you can move to sleeping on your side or front depends on how healing is going and on your surgeon's advice.

Showering, wound and dressings: When you may shower depends on the dressing used. If there is a skin incision, once allowed you can shower without rubbing the wound and pat the area dry gently. Baths, swimming pools and the sea wait until the wound has closed completely.

Arm movement: The arms can be used for everyday tasks within the limits of pain. In the first weeks, sudden, forceful and repetitive arm movements, heavy lifting and activities that stretch the chest area are avoided. Staying still for long periods is not right either. Short walks are encouraged early on and lower the risk of clots.

Pain: Pain is expected in the first days and is controlled with the painkillers provided. The pain is expected to ease a little each day. Pain that keeps increasing despite painkillers needs assessment.

Returning to work and sport: Desk work is resumed within 1 to 2 weeks. Work involving heavy lifting, and sport, wait about 6 weeks. Returning to exercise starts with walking and low-impact movement, leaving running and jumping until last; a supportive bra is worn during exercise.

Driving: At least 2 weeks is allowed. You can drive once you can wear the seatbelt comfortably, perform steering movements and an emergency stop without pain, and are no longer taking painkillers that cause drowsiness.

Sexual activity: Sexual activity can resume once you feel comfortable and everyday movements no longer cause marked pain. In the first weeks, pressure on the breasts and forceful movement should be avoided.

Smoking and weight: Smoking impairs wound healing after surgery as well; cigarettes and nicotine products should be avoided until healing is complete. Gaining weight after surgery can change the shape of the breast.

What is normal: Swelling, bruising, a feeling of firmness, small firm areas that can be felt, numbness in the nipple and along the side of the chest, occasional stabbing pains and a temporary difference in swelling between the two sides are all expected. Most of the swelling settles in the first months; the tissues softening and the final shape emerging can take 3 to 6 months. This varies from person to person.

How does the scar change?

A breast lift is an operation that leaves a scar. Where the scar falls depends on the approach chosen, but there is no scarless breast lift.

The scar looks red and raised in the first months, then fades and softens. This can take up to 1 year. Its final appearance depends on how the person heals, on skin colour and on the area; how well it will settle cannot be predicted with certainty beforehand.

Some measures can be used to reduce the chance of a scar becoming raised, widened or prominent. Once the wound has closed completely and on your surgeon's advice, silicone-based gel or silicone sheeting and scar massage may be suggested. These measures do not guarantee the outcome. Starting too early can harm the wound, so your surgeon sets the timing.

Direct sun darkens a scar, so it needs protecting during the first year.

Risks and complications

Complication rates vary widely between studies. The information below comes from particular patient groups and does not indicate any one person's individual risk.

In a systematic review pooling 1,888 patients from 34 studies, the total complication rate for a lift performed without an implant was 10.4 per cent. The two most frequently reported headings were scar problems (3 per cent) and problems involving the nipple and areola (2.9 per cent). Dissatisfaction with the shape achieved was reported in only 1.3 per cent of patients.²

In the review of lifts with an implant, the total complication rate was 13.1 per cent and the reoperation rate 10.7 per cent.³ These two reviews cover different patient groups, different techniques, different follow-up periods and different definitions of complications; comparing the figures directly would not be sound.

Risks and unwanted outcomes

Prominent scar: The most frequently reported problem. A scar may remain raised or widened and may need revision.²

Problems involving the nipple and areola: Distortion, asymmetry or reduced sensation may affect the nipple and areola. The review reported these nipple-areola-related problems together at 2.9 per cent; that is not a rate of sensory loss alone.²

Altered sensation: Numbness, tingling or heightened sensitivity in the nipple or breast skin can appear early. Some of it may settle over time; permanent reduction or loss is also possible.¹² There is no single reliable figure for permanent sensory loss that applies to every lift technique. Technique, the distance the nipple travels and previous operations can all affect the outcome.

Wound separation: Usually a small area where the scars meet. Most small separations heal with dressings; wider or deeper separations may need further treatment. Healing can take weeks and the scar may stay more visible there.

Asymmetry: A difference in height, shape or areola size between the two sides can remain. Asymmetry present before surgery may not disappear entirely.

Temporary difference in shape and swelling: A difference between the two sides during healing usually lessens with time.

Other important complications

Blood collection (haematoma): It shows itself in the first hours or first days after surgery as rapidly increasing swelling, firmness and pain in one breast. A return to theatre may be needed to drain what has collected.

Serious infection: Presents with redness, warmth, increasing pain, discharge and bad odour. Depending on severity, antibiotics, dressings, drainage or more advanced treatment may be needed. A meta-analysis of breast reduction patients associated a high body mass index and smoking with infection, smoking additionally with wound breakdown, and diabetes with complications overall.¹³ That data comes from breast reduction patients and does not belong directly to a lift.

Circulation problems in the nipple and areola: The areola is the darker area around the nipple. If the blood supply to this area is compromised the colour darkens, and partial or total loss of the nipple and areola can follow. Necrosis of skin or fat can also occur. Dressings, drainage, removal of dead tissue or further surgery may be needed. Total loss is a serious but uncommon complication.¹² The effect of smoking and nicotine on wound healing is covered separately below.

Blood clots: A clot forming in the leg veins and travelling to the lungs is serious. One-sided leg pain and swelling, sudden shortness of breath or chest pain need urgent assessment.

Anaesthesia and other risks: Problems related to general anaesthesia, allergic reactions and pain persisting after surgery can occur.

In patients who have carried an implant before and undergo further surgery, the blood supply of the skin and tissue is a separate heading. A review of aesthetic implant revision surgery pooling 1,515 patients from 12 studies found a skin-envelope complication rate of 2.84 per cent.¹⁴ That group is not limited to patients having a lift at the same time as implant removal.

Does the drooping come back?

A lift corrects drooping but does not remove what causes it. Gravity, skin elasticity, weight change, pregnancy and ageing all carry on working after surgery.

Several distinct situations should be told apart here: recurrence of true drooping, pseudoptosis, lengthening of the lower pole over time, loss of upper pole fullness, and the normal settling of tissues in the early period.

In the review of operations combining a lift with an augmentation in one session, recurrent drooping was reported at 5.2 per cent.³ That figure belongs to that group; it is not the long-term recurrence rate of a lift without an implant. The review of lifts without implants likewise identifies the possibility of recurrent drooping as something to explain before surgery.²

Placing a supporting mesh inside the breast is being tried as a way of reducing recurrence. In a review of 31 studies and 2,425 patients, 24 were retrospective series and 7 prospective observational studies; only 3 had a control group and there were no randomised trials. There is no common outcome measure, and 58 per cent of the studies reported a financial relationship with a manufacturer. This review was not limited to absorbable mesh or to lift operations; it also covered other materials and augmentation, reduction and revision procedures. The review concludes that the evidence is insufficient to recommend routine use.¹⁵

These figures do not predict any one person's result. The factors that can change the result over time are pregnancy, breastfeeding, weight change, ageing, the volume and weight of the breast, the qualities of the skin and connective tissue, the technique used and whether an implant was placed.

There is no guarantee that the result will stay unchanged or last for a particular period.

Is breastfeeding possible?

Breastfeeding after a breast lift may be possible. It cannot, however, be guaranteed that breastfeeding or an adequate milk supply will be preserved. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention states that breast augmentation, lift and reduction procedures may affect the nerves and ducts within the breast and thereby affect lactation.¹⁶

The factors that affect the outcome are which tissue the nipple keeps its blood supply through, how far the continuity of the milk glands and ducts is preserved, the state of the nerves running to the nipple, whether tissue removal accompanies the operation, and the person's own lactation characteristics. Breastfeeding before the operation can also affect breastfeeding afterwards. These factors are discussed at the consultation before surgery.

Where the nipple is fully detached and placed as a graft, breastfeeding is not expected. After birth the baby's weight gain should be monitored, and breastfeeding support sought if milk production is insufficient.¹⁶

If you are planning a pregnancy or breastfeeding, raise it before surgery. It can affect both the technique and the timing.

What can be expected from the result?

A breast lift is reported as an operation with high patient satisfaction. In the review pooling 34 studies, the outcome was reported as an "unsatisfactory breast shape" in 1.3 per cent.² That is not a rate obtained with a validated satisfaction measure, and the studies included differ from one another.

Against that, the same review stresses that scar problems, asymmetry and the possibility of drooping returning should be explained to the patient before surgery.²

Two points help set expectations correctly. A lift raises the breast; it does not increase its volume. Fullness in the upper pole is limited by how much tissue there is and how it is shaped; where additional volume is needed, an implant or fat transfer can be considered. Second, the result is not an unchanging one; pregnancy, weight change and ageing continue to alter the shape of the breast after surgery.

When should you contact a doctor?

Contact the surgical team in the following situations:

• Fever
• Increasing redness, warmth, discharge or bad odour at the wound
• Rapidly increasing swelling, firmness or pain in one breast
• The wound opening noticeably
• Darkening, bruising or blackening of the nipple or areola
• Pain that keeps increasing despite painkillers

The following two findings need urgent assessment:

• One-sided leg pain or swelling
• Sudden shortness of breath or chest pain

About the numbers in this article

The rates above come from studies in different patient groups, with different techniques and over different periods. Techniques in the mastopexy literature vary widely and outcome measures differ from study to study, which makes the rates hard to compare directly.

Follow-up periods are also short. Drooping returns over years, whereas most of the studies in the review of single-stage augmentation with a lift report follow-up of under a year.³ Reported recurrence rates may therefore look lower than they are.

For that reason the numbers here do not predict any one person's result. They give a general framework only.

References

1. Mangialardi ML, Zena M, Baldelli I, Spinaci S, Raposio E. The use of autologous flaps in breast reshaping after massive weight loss: a systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022;46(2):644-654. doi:10.1007/s00266-021-02717-2 ↩

2. di Summa PG, Oranges CM, Watfa W, et al. Systematic review of outcomes and complications in nonimplant-based mastopexy surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(2):243-272. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2018.10.018 ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷

3. Khavanin N, Jordan SW, Rambachan A, Kim JYS. A systematic review of single-stage augmentation-mastopexy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(5):922-931. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000582 ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

4. Lucocq J, Shoaib T. Long-term outcomes after single-stage augmentation mastopexy: a ten-year series and risk stratification model. JPRAS Open. 2026;49:272-283. doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2026.02.026 ↩

5. Danilla S, Cayupán C, Cala L, Durán H. Long-term satisfaction with breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy in the Latin American population. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;48(17):3370-3377. doi:10.1007/s00266-024-03900-x ↩

6. Swanson E. A systematic review of radiofrequency and helium plasma radiofrequency alternatives to mastopexy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026;50(3):1109-1117. doi:10.1007/s00266-025-05295-9 ↩

7. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Managing the risks of smoking in plastic surgery patients. Practice reference, 9 October 2024. Accessed 5 September 2026. plasticsurgery.org ↩

8. Mills E, Eyawo O, Lockhart I, Kelly S, Wu P, Ebbert JO. Smoking cessation reduces postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2011;124(2):144-154.e8. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.09.013 ↩

9. Fiddes RA, McCaffrey N. Preoperative smoking-cessation interventions to prevent postoperative complications: a quality assessment and overview of systematic review evidence. Anesth Analg. 2025;140(6):1377-1387. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000007187 ↩

10. Tang E, Rodriguez RM, Srivastava A, et al. Impact of short duration smoking cessation on post-operative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2025;106:111967. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111967 ↩

11. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Breast lift recovery. Accessed 9 August 2026. plasticsurgery.org ↩

12. American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Breast lift risks and safety. Accessed 9 August 2026. plasticsurgery.org ↩ ↩²

13. Liu D, Wu M, Xu X, et al. Risk factors and complications in reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(6):2330-2344. doi:10.1007/s00266-023-03387-y ↩

14. Pagliara D, Grieco F, Schiavone L, Salgarello M, Rancati A. Breast envelope complications after revision breast implant surgery: a systematic review. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026;50(11):3969-3978. doi:10.1007/s00266-026-05688-4 ↩

15. Wong GH, Hamilton S. A systematic review of mesh support of the breast in aesthetic breast surgery. JPRAS Open. 2025;45:185-198. doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2025.06.001 ↩

16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast surgery and breastfeeding. 8 December 2025. Accessed 5 September 2026. cdc.gov ↩ ↩²